Potential Workers’ Compensation Reform in Michigan – what does it mean for Ohio?

During my last semester of law school, I completed a research paper on the national trend of state legislatures imposing limits on employer workers’ compensation liability.  Unfortunately, this trend is continuing in Michigan, where House Bill 5002 is working its way through the state legislature.

House Bill 5002 seeks to reduce the cost of workers’ compensation on the state budget.  This reduction, however, comes at a steep price for injured workers.  For example, the bill would require an injured worker who cannot perform the position in which he or she was injured to look for other work within “his or her qualifications, training and transferable skills.”  If an injured worker cannot find such work, their benefits may nonetheless be reduced by wages of positions he or she could perform.  As a result, “workers’ comp benefits could be reduced based on theoretical wages….”

Similarly, if an injured worker is eligible for a pension, but has not elected to take it, at the time of injury, House Bill 5002 would allow for the reduction of benefits based on the amount the injured worker could have been collecting had they chosen to retire.  Thus, an injured worker “‘could see their worker compensation benefit greatly reduced or wiped out altogether to offset a pension they don’t receive.”

The other main anti-worker component to House Bill 5002 would expand a Michigan employer’s ability to control an injured worker’s treatment from ten (10) days to forty-five (45) days (in Ohio, injured workers have the freedom to select a provider of their choice at anytime during their treatment, so long as the physician is BWC certified).

So, what does this mean for Ohio?  The current administration in Columbus has made no secret about its desire to reform Ohio’s workers’ compensation system.  Shortly after winning the gubernatorial election in November 2010, John Kasich appointed Steve Bueher as the Administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation.  In so doing, Governor Kasich stated that, in his opinion, the workers’ compensation system in Ohio “is a mess of red tape and anti-business processes,” spurring the need for reform.  Further, the state legislature is set to discuss workers’ compensation reform in the new year.  Let’s just hope it does not adopt any of the anti-worker ideas currently making the rounds just across the border.

One Response to “Potential Workers’ Compensation Reform in Michigan – what does it mean for Ohio?”

  1. Elizabeth Breckel says:

    Given the number of totally healthy unemployed workers in MI, it is amazing to me that this type of change could even be considered at this time. It is another slap in the pocket the working people of Michigan. It is hard to pull yourself by your bootstraps when you don’t have shoes.

Leave a Reply

Legal Disclaimer:
This Blog and all materials on it have been prepared by Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer Co., L.P.A. for informational purposes only and not as legal advice. While we do attempt to keep our material up-to-date, we cannot guarantee that it is either complete or current, and it may not reflect the latest legal developments. Do not act upon any information contained in this Blog without seeking the advice of legal counsel licensed in your own state. Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer does not wish to represent anyone who is in a state where this Blog fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. We are NOT your lawyers until you and we have each signed a written contract stating that we are your lawyers. The attorneys and employees of Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer, Co, L.P.A. will make every effort to reply to e-mail inquiries as promptly as possible. However, we cannot guarantee that we will always be able to quickly respond to your questions. If you have a time-sensitive inquiry, please call us at 419-843-2001 or 800-352-1976. Please feel free to send us e-mail with your comments, suggestions or questions. But understand that sending e-mail to our firm or to any attorney in the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Communications between you and an attorney are not privileged until the parties have agreed upon legal representation and we cannot agree to maintain the confidentiality of such communications. Please do not send confidential information to us via e-mail without first communicating directly with us by telephone. E-mail is not a secure medium of communication. Links to other Blogs or to Web sites are not intended as endorsements of the linked sites. The linked sites are not under the control of Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer Co., L. P.A. and we are not responsible for the contents of any linked site. If you have read this whole disclaimer, congratulations on your perseverance. Please let us know any way we can help you.